I think it was year 1990 or 1991 when I was in the United World College attending a media summit organized by the school faculty and students. A few prominent speakers, including some movers and shakers of the media industry, were invited to address the students about the role of the media and its impact in the political world. I don’t remember who the speaker (some American journalist) was now, but she was talking about her views on news productions around the world. “You know what’s the worst news reporting production I have seen so far,” she shared in the middle of her speech. “It was the Hong Kong TV news programs.” There was laughter and gasps. My schoolmates immediately turned to me giggling. Being one of the only two Hong Kong students in the school, suddenly I felt that I was singled out. Should I say something? Should I defend something – anything? The speaker didn’t need to be a genius to realize that a poor Hong Kong ambassador was in the hall, and she reiterated: “I’m serious. The newscasters were babbling on and on at a piece that needs not much explaining.”
Maybe I didn’t quite get it at the time, since I hardly had much else to reference to, having only been away from my home town for less than a year. But I get it now, big time. Some 20 years later, I am still amazed and amused by where we are today with our news productions.
First a disclaimer. I know nothing much about the industry, and my frame of reference since then has been largely related to that of the States. But I think I am still entitled to share my views as a TV audience, and one attempting to seek up-to-date information from the local programs. By the way, there aren’t that many choices to begin with.
I am a complete believer in news reporters’ and the station’s impartiality in any news stories, but do they all have to be so stone-faced and robotic? Those of us who are also in the “people business” understand that we as the messengers play a huge part in getting our messages across. How we say it and how we deliver it is an art by itself. Yet throughout the few decades of TV news programs I have seen, it seems that there is a cardinal rule in their training programs that no news reporters or anchors should ever shed a single hint of emotion and intonation, whatsoever. Hey, don’t get that mixed up with adding an opinion, as I know they aren’t talk show hosts and they are not supposed to. I am talking about adding the right pause, phrasing, and emphasis to the key points, conclusions and transitions. Sometimes subtle body language and hand gestures may be appropriate. Though no, all I see is complete stiffness from beginning to end. Maybe this is requested and demanded by the viewers? I’m not sure, and I’m not one of them.
I like news anchors who have credibility and professionalism, and it takes them years on the field to gain that hard-earned reputation. I don’t want them to turn into another extreme like some of the TV news programs in Taiwan, where the programs are much closer to entertainment than anything else, just so they could push up ratings in a relatively much more competitive media market than Hong Kong. Despite the authoritative figure, I like to see some personalities being presented from time to time. That brings an element of relatability, trust and connection with the audience. I understand it can be hard to do here because the local presenters are not as high paid, their career prospect not as secure and promising, and hence it will be much tougher for them to build a distinct brand for themselves.
That’s what I would like to see changed, at least progressively. It starts from the top at the leadership level, and goes down to where news stories are reported. The news transcripts do not need to repeat everything we are already seeing on TV. Come on, we are watching news with news feeds. The news stories can stand to be a bit more original and non-repetitive. Interviewing parents and school kids every year on September 1 when the new school year starts is not newsworthy material, similar to shooting at the flower market every Valentine’s Day, or dim sum restaurants on Mother’s Day. Asking passing by citizens on the streets what they think of the recent public bus fare hike can only lead to one uniform answer. Every time, I feel that 20 to 30 minutes of my life is robbed. I don’t dislike the events themselves, I am just longing for a few more original questions or angles on them.
We need some pioneers and some daring moves to push everyone out of their comfort zones once in a while, even if they are of the TV viewers. I want to envision myself jumping out of my auditorium chair some day, defending the next coming critique if I am fortunate enough to get stuck representing Hong Kong again.
Leave a Reply